Legal Opinion

State v. Goffstein

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 3, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property, to-wit, eighteen batteries of the value of more than $30, knowing same to have been stolen, was sentenced to three years' imprisonment in the penitentiary and has appealed. By his brief here he presents two questions: First, the sufficiency of the evidence and, second, certain matters pertaining to the qualification of the jury.

Fifty Willard batteries, of the approximate wholesale value of $5 each, were stolen on or near December 1, 1934, from the Central Battery Company, Inc., in St. Louis. The place was burglarized and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Gould v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. Gann v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. State v. HuettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. State v. HonigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State v. WillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. State v. LondeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. State v. LaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API