Legal Opinion

Gould v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 16, 1926PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Action for personal injuries. The jury found for plaintiff and assessed his damages at the sum of $15,000. Defendant has appealed from the judgment rendered on such verdict.

The petition alleged several negligent acts on the part of defendant. At the request of plaintiff, the trial court gave an instruction withdrawing from the consideration of the jury all grounds of negligence alleged in the petition, except the single ground submitted in Instruction 1, which was based on the humanitarian rule. The amended answer contained a general denial, a plea of contributory negligence, and a plea that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eppstein v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Miller v. ConnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. George v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Dudley v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Kickham v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Dempsey v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Burr v. SinghSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API