Zweig v. Zweig
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Van Winkle, A. M.
The petitioner in this divorce suit íiled a bill for maintenance in 1932, alleging extremely cruel treatment on the part of defendant, and that “defendant remained with complainant under the same roof until the 24th day of November, 1932, at which time he completely severed all his relations with complainant and left and abandoned her, without her 2>ermission or consent, and separated himself from her.”
*762On final hearing counsel for defendant admitted, without any evidence about extreme cruelty or abandonment being taken, that defendant had unjustifiably abandoned complainant;…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Feickert v. FeickertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Pinkinson v. PinkinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Rogers v. RogersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Grant v. GrantNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Sheehan v. SheehanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952