Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Dep't of Motor Vehicles v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1998No. B113661PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.-
Introduction
Petitioner State of California, acting through the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), seeks a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate the order certifying a class of persons entitled to refund of vehicle license fees on motor vehicles originally sold outside California that were higher than the fees charged similar vehicles first sold within the state.
DMV contends the class certified by the trial court does not conform with the instructions issued by the California Supreme Court in Woosley v. State of California (1992) 3 Cal.4th 758 [13 Cal.Rptr.2d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vernon v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Hypertouch, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Anne Arundel County v. Cambridge CommonsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- In re Franchise Tax Bd. Ltd. Liab. Corp. Tax Refund Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- McCabe v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.