Legal Opinion
Hypertouch, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 2005No. A108321PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
This writ proceeding arises out of a class action alleging the sending of unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile machine in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) (47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C)), which authorizes a private right of action in state court. (Id., § 227(b)(3).)
Petitioner Hypertouch, Inc., a California corporation based in Redwood City, is the named plaintiff, and real party in interest Perry Johnson, Inc., a consulting company that does business in California, is the defendant. In addition to actual and punitive damages, and…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Chavez v. Netflix, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In re Insurance Installment Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Louie v. BFS Retail & Commercial Operations, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.