Sickles v. Manhattan Gas-Light Co.
New York Supreme Court
Tbial of issues of fact.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Yobst, J.
— It is urged by the learned counsel for the defendant that the Laws of 1859 {chap. 11) provide for the appointment of a state inspector, by whom every gas meter, before it is used by the defendant, shall be tested and sealed, and that such meter is by the statute made .the legal measure of gas, as between the consumer and the company, and that, as the same statute is careful to provide, that in case a consumer shall question the correctness of any meter, the company is required to test it, in the presence of the consumer, if required, and that if then dissatisfied with the test made by the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Seaton Mountain Electric Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Idaho Springs Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co. v. Long Island Machine & Marine Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Cracknell v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Taylor v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916