Legal Opinion

Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. Stanley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1934No. 6185PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

Stanley recovered a judgment for actual and exemplary damages against the plaintiff in error, which upon appeal was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. (45 S. W. (2d) 671). The statement of the case in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is quite full, and we deem an elaborate statement here unnecessary. Stanley, with his family, resided in Queen City, Texas. His residence was wired and equipped for the use of "electricity, used by him for ordinary household purposes, including lights and refrigeration, and for pumping water from his well. He also owned a business enterprise…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Carmichael v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Birmingham Water Works Co. v. KeileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Scheps v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. King v. McGuffTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. McDonough v. ZamoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API