Legal Opinion

Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Budrus

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 22, 1983No. 82-1501PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.

August Richter appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his counterclaim against Edward Budrus’ insurer, Western Casualty and Surety Company. The issue on appeal is whether Western, under the terms of its policy, has an obligation to defend Budrus for the sale of mistagged seed to Richter. Because we con- elude that Western has an obligation to defend, we reverse.

The facts are undisputed, and the action is therefore appropriate for summary judgment. In June, 1979, Richter purchased 400 pounds of Birdsfoot Trefoil seed, a perennial seed high in protein for cows, from Budrus, who operates a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Olguin v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sterilite Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Lucker Manufacturing, a Unit of Amclyde Engineered Products, Inc. v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API