Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hume

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1927No. 5479PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiaji.

1. Possession by a grantor after the conveyance by him of land is held under the grantee, and is not adverse to him, and neither prescription nor the statute of limitations is available as a defense to an action to enjoin such grantor from repeated trespasses upon the land. Jay v. Whelchel, 78 Ga. 786 (3 S. E. 906).

2. A sale by a trustee of land held by him in trust for beneficiaries is in effect a sale by such beneficiaries, and the beneficiaries can not prescribe against the title conveyed by their trustee.

3. The court charged the jury as follows: “If the defendants or either of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jay v. WhelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Johnson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Georgia Chemical WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Stepp v. SteppSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Sweat v. ArlineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Thomas v. StedhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Anderson v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API