Johnson v. Hume
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cubiaji.
1. Possession by a grantor after the conveyance by him of land is held under the grantee, and is not adverse to him, and neither prescription nor the statute of limitations is available as a defense to an action to enjoin such grantor from repeated trespasses upon the land. Jay v. Whelchel, 78 Ga. 786 (3 S. E. 906).
2. A sale by a trustee of land held by him in trust for beneficiaries is in effect a sale by such beneficiaries, and the beneficiaries can not prescribe against the title conveyed by their trustee.
3. The court charged the jury as follows: “If the defendants or either of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jay v. WhelchelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Johnson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chandler v. Georgia Chemical WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Stepp v. SteppSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Sweat v. ArlineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Thomas v. StedhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Anderson v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.