Legal Opinion

Jay v. Whelchel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1887PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Deeds. Mortgages. Vendor and Purchaser. Debtor and Creditor. Prescription. Before Judge Estes. Lump-kin Superior Court. October Term, 1886. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

In 1860; Jay executed a deed to Whelchel, conveying certain land. It was an ordinary deed, absolute in all its terms, conveying the land in fee simple, with warranty of title. Upon the back of it was endorsed an entry, signed by Whelchel, the grantee, to the effect that it was to be returned to Jay cancelled, on condition that Jay paid by a certain time $90, with interest thereon from date. This entry on the back is of the same date as the deed itself. An action of ejectment, after the lapse of many years, was brought by Whelchel against Jay, and on the trial, this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Broach v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Ford v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Thaxton v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gassert v. BogkMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Chandler v. Georgia Chemical WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Malette v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Gauker v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  5. Sweat v. ArlineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API