Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger Allen Doane

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 11, 1992No. 91-2214PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERAS, District Judge.

Appellant Roger Allen Doane, a licensed attorney practicing in Salisbury, Massachusetts, was convicted after a jury trial in the District of New Hampshire of bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344), interstate transportation of securities taken by fraud (18 U.S.C. § 2314), and four counts of embezzlement (18 U.S.C. § 656). On this appeal, he attacks his conviction alleging an incorrect jury instruction relating to Section 2314, insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction under Section 656, and an incorrect and prejudicial denial of two motions to suppress. Finding no merit in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Don C. Davis, United States of America v. Daniel M. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. John F. Golden, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Salamone v. Douglas Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. CofieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. (PC) Beinlick v. AungDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PC) Benanti v. MatevousianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Carr v. BalajiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API