Legal Opinion
(PC) Beinlick v. Aung
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 15, 2024No. 2:19-cv-02095Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN BEINLICK, No. 2:19-cv-2095 DAD AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SANDAR AUNG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, has filed motions to modify the scheduling order, to 18 withdraw deemed admissions, and for an extension of time to respond to defendants’ motions for 19 summary judgment. ECF Nos. 41, 42, 52. Defendants oppose the motions. ECF Nos. 44-46, 53, 20 54. 21 I. Motion to Modify Scheduling Order 22 By order filed April 24, 2023, the undersigned set a schedule…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michael J. Conlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Roger Allen DoaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992