Legal Opinion

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2020No. 1:17-cv-01556Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BENANTI, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT BE DENIED ) 14 MATEVOUSIAN, ) [ECF No. 82] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). This matter was 20 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API