State v. Fleming
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
Two issues are presented for our determination in this case. The first is whether a Trial Court’s (Nadeau, J.) instructions to a jury on an indictment for second-degree murder must include an explanation of the term “malice aforethought.” The second is whether the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to pay $36,000 in restitution to the victim’s family. We hold that the use of the term “malice aforethought” is not required in a jury charge for second-degree murder. In addition, we find that the trial court erred in sentencing this defendant to make the restitution ordered.
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- United States v. WeldenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
- People v. HeilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JarvisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. EnoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.