Legal Opinion

State v. Fleming

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 26, 1984No. 82-367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Two issues are presented for our determination in this case. The first is whether a Trial Court’s (Nadeau, J.) instructions to a jury on an indictment for second-degree murder must include an explanation of the term “malice aforethought.” The second is whether the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to pay $36,000 in restitution to the victim’s family. We hold that the use of the term “malice aforethought” is not required in a jury charge for second-degree murder. In addition, we find that the trial court erred in sentencing this defendant to make the restitution ordered.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. United States v. WeldenDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
  4. People v. HeilMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. BenoitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Renfro v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JarvisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. EnoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API