Miller v. Linguist
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Palo Pinto County; W. J. Oxford, Judge. Action by E. W. Miller against E. J. Wilcox and Frank Richards, in which John Linguist intervened. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals,- and, from a judgment in favor of intervener Linguist, defendant Richards appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.
[1] E. W. Miller instituted this suit to recover of E. J. Wilcox an undivided one-half interest in a block of land in the town of Mineral Wells. Subsequently, Frank Richards became a party defendant and John Linguist an intervener in the suit. The cause of action upon which plaintiff relied for a recovery consisted in the allegations contained in the second count of his petition, substantially as follows: On or about April 24, 1884, plaintiff contracted with defendant Wilcox to sell the property in controversy to Wilcox, who, as a part of the consideration therefor, executed and delivered to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Frost v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Burkitt v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Buckley v. RungeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Moore v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re FultonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
- Boulware v. KempnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Mullens v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Simms v. EspindolaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958