Legal Opinion

Frost v. Wolf

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1890No. 6507PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Williamson. Tried below before Hon. A. S. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

—This is an action of trespass to try title to one-third of two-thirds of a league and labor of land patented to Herman Aiken on January 5,1847. Plaintiffs are the widow of Samuel Frost, to whom he was married in 1861, and their children, and his children by a former wife. The foundation of their claim is a transfer of a one-third interest in the certificate by virtue of which the land was granted, made to Frost by Aiken on February 21,1839. That transfer was made by an endorsement on the certificate and by a more formal conveyance, both of the same date. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Herbert v. HanrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Martin v. WeymanTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Byam v. BickfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Grady v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Callahan v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. NilesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Abernathy v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Patten v. Herring & KelleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Bank of PembrokeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API