Legal Opinion
Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 21, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02621Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 18-cv-02621-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. CERTIFY THE ORDER ENTERED AT DKT. NO. 247 FOR INTERLOCUTORY 10 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE APPEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 263 Defendants. 12 13 In this patent infringement case, plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) accuses defendant Check 14 Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (collectively 15 “Check Point”) of infringing on several of its patents related to cyber security. There have been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.