Legal Opinion
Jonas v. Isuzu Motors Ltd.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided July 11, 2002No. 5:00-cv-00344PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OWENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought suit alleging strict liability, breach of warranty and negligence claims related to an accident involving a 1993 Isuzu Rodeo Diversity jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and Georgia law is the applicable substantive law of the case. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the punitive damages issue. Plaintiffs do not oppose summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages but do oppose summary judgment on all other claims. After carefully considering the entire record…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Talley v. City Tank Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Greenway v. Peabody International Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. BLITZ USA, INC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- Weaver v. Paccar Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014