Legal Opinion

Kinnear v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1923No. 17567PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

—Appellants instituted this action for the purpose of obtaining relief from an alleged excessive valuation for taxation purposes ‘placed upon certain real property owned by them in the city of Seattle for the year 1920. They allege that, in the year 1920, the taxing officials of King county, disregarding their official duty, made for assessment purposes an arbitrary valuation of the property, actuated by an alleged necessity of raising a given amount of revenue, and in doing so valued the property of appellants at two or three times the valuation permitted by statute. Appellants made a tender…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. First Thought Gold Mines, Ltd. v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Finch v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schleman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Fitzsimmons v. McCorkleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Inland Empire Land Co. v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Tacoma Mill Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. John S. Baker Investment Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API