Legal Opinion

Tacoma Mill Co. v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1924No. 18665PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The Tacoma Mill Company seeks recovery of the sum of $3,119.30 from Pierce county, claimed as an unwarranted excess of taxes which the mill company was, by the county authorities, coerced into paying upon approximately ten acres of tide land and fifteen acres of adjoining upland in the city of Tacoma. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for Pierce county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding to the mill company recovery as prayed for, from which the county has appealed to this court.

These two tracts of land may, for purposes of our present discussion,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kinnear v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Inland Empire Railroad v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Inland Empire Land Co. v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Crosby v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Inland Empire Land Co. v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. John S. Baker Investment Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. North Shore Land Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API