Legal Opinion

Succession of Rabouin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 5, 1942No. 36581PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether the unpaid balance of the consideration for an annuity contract, at the time of the death of the annuitant, should be paid to the named beneficiary, without regard for the law of forced heirship, or must be considered as belonging to the estate of the annuitant for the purpose of computing the disposable portion of his estate. There are two such annuity contracts in this case. The judge of’the civil district court decided that the unpaid balance of the consideration for the annuities belonged to the estate of the annuitant. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Commonwealth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Sizeler v. SizelerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. TL James & Co., Inc. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. In Re TalbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1981
  3. Gregg v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Matter of YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1986
  5. In Re OrsoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API