Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Beisel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1940No. Appeal, 53PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The question presented by the Commonwealth on this appeal is whether the proceeds of certain insurance policies constitute an “annuity” within the meaning of that term as used in the State Personal Property Tax Act of June 22,1935, P. L. 414, section 3, and the amendatory Act of May 18, 1937, P. L. 633.

W. Clayton Hackett, who died in 1930, was insured in two life insurance policies for the benefit of his daughter, now Ann Hackett Beisel. One was that of the Equitable Life Assurance Society for $10,000, the other that of the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barber's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Arbuckle's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Keiper v. United Zion HomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Herman Neil YOUNG, Debtor. Herman Neil YOUNG, Appellant, v. David v. ADLER, Trustee, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. In Re McCollamSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. UNISYS Corp. v. Pennsylvania Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Unisys Corp. v. Nebraska Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dwight EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API