Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Goodgame v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1928No. 5 Div. 989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This court has defined the law pertaining to the subject of this litigation in numerous cases. Some of them may be mentioned as follows: Pettus v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 214 Ala. 191, 106 So. 807; Wilson Bros, v. M. & O. R. R. Co., 208 Ala. 581, 94 So. 721; Id., 207 Ala. 171, 92 So. 246; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Davenport, 195 Ala. 368, 70 So. 674; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Reese, 85 Ala. 502, 5 So. 283. 7 Am. St. Rep. 66; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Hanbury, 161 Ala. 358, 49 So. 467; A. G. S. R. R. Co. v. Loveman, 196 Ala. 683, 72 So. 311; So. Ry. Co. v. Dickens, 161 Ala. 144, 49 So. 766. The burden of proof…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City Delivery Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Collum Motor Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. James v. Governor's House, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Howell v. Birmingham Nehi Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API