Legal Opinion

Howell v. Birmingham Nehi Bottling Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 6, 1958No. 6 Div. 203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in a suit for damages against the Birmingham Nehi *293Bottling Company and Winfred F. Singleton, resulting from a collision between a truck driven by Singleton and an automobile driven by plaintiff. Singleton was the servant or agent of the bottling company, owner of the truck, and was acting in the line and scope of his authority on that occasion. The collision occurred on August 22, 1955, about 3 P.M. on a clear day. The automobile was in front of the truck, and both vehicles were traveling north on Sixteenth Street, North,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Aplin v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Zemczonek v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Castro v. Budget Rent-A-Car System, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Kinard v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Smith v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Clayton v. LLB TIMBER CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. PowersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API