Schembeck v. Village Board of Village of Dolgeville
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We conclude that the determination was based on substantial evidence in the record. Discrepancies between two reports prepared by petitioner describing the accident, as well as testimony that no evidence was found supporting petitioner’s account of the accident, raised the issue of petitioner’s credibility. The hearing officer found petitioner’s version of the accident to be incredible. Since the hearing officer has the opportunity to observe the demeanor and conduct of the witnesses, his findings should be accorded considerable weight (Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, 38 NY2d 391, 394).
We also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simpson v. WolanskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Doino v. LaehyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Madry v. VeteranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Darling v. HastingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- MATTER OF DOINO v. LaehyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williams v. DooleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989