Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Robert E. Denike, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 2, 1937No. 6197PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court holding that the appellant, hereinafter called defendant, was liable in the sum of $2,577.23 on a bond under the Heard Act (40 U.S.C.A. § 270) for labor and materials furnished by the appellee, hereinafter called plaintiff.

On May 31, 1932, the United States government entered into a contract with the Wallace Construction Company, hereinafter called the Construction Company, for the erection of a post office building in Paterson, N. J. On June 2, 1932, the defendant became surety on the bond of the Construction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Burley v. Compagnie de Navigation FrancaiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. Imperial Refining Co. v. Kanotex Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Strathleven Steamship Co. v. BaulchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard C. Hayes and Gladys I. Hayes, His Wife, Stanwood P. Whiteley and Margaret Whiteley, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States Ex Rel. Vigilanti v. Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Const. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
  3. EBR CORPORATION v. PSL Air Lease CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  4. United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  5. American Creosote Works, Inc. v. Caltoman Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API