Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Vigilanti v. Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Const. Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 14, 1938No. 7572PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This action is one brought against the Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Construction Corporation, as principal, and the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, as surety on its bond.
On or about November 8, 1935, the United States of America and the defendant, Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Construction Corporation, entered into a contract whereby the Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Construction Cor poration agreed to furnish all of the labor and materials and to do and perform all the work required for the construction of the United States Post Office, at Ocean and Church Avenues, Brooklyn, New York.
That on or about…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Lake County v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. SavageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- Burley v. Compagnie de Navigation FrancaiseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Drill South, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Drill South, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter v. International Fidelity Ins. Co., Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- First Mobile Home Corporation v. LittleMississippi Supreme Court · 1974
- Heritage Ins. Co. v. FOSTER ELEC. CO. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Gearhart v. Pierce Enterprises, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Kentucky Natural Resources & Environmental Protection CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.