Legal Opinion
Citrin v. Erikson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1996No. 95 Civ. 9004 (DNE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The instant petition arises under the provisions of section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, and section 302(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 186(c). The parties to this action are the two groups of trustees who jointly administer a multi-employer and union apprentice plan to provide training for the exclusive benefit of individuals interested in working in the elevator industry. Petitioners1 are the trustees appointed by the employers (“Petitioners” or “Association…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blair v. Young Phillips Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
- Citrin v. EriksonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Employer Trustees of W. PA Teamsters v. Union Trustees of W. PA TeamstersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Union Trustees of W. Pa Teamsters v. Employees of W.Pa TeamstersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016