Legal Opinion

Paraffine Companies, Inc. v. Kipp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The appeal in this matter was dismissed because the order sought to be reviewed was not an appeal-able order. It was a ruling on motions to strike certain paragraphs of an answer as sham, frivolous, or irrelevant after a stipulation had been entered into by the parties agreeing “that the motion to strike be considered by the court as a demurrer to each particular paragraph to which the motion to strike is directed.” The parties entered into the above stipulation over a year after the date of the second motion to strike, and provided in it that there be added to each paragraph involved in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Home Insurance v. PutnalSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Stafford v. General Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gauger v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bolick v. GallagherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lounsbury v. EberleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API