Legal Opinion

Pegan v. Crawmer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 96-2852PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Pegan asserts in her sole proposition of law that attorney fees are not available as costs absent statutory authority or frivolous conduct on the part of the nonprevailing party. For the reasons that follow, we sustain Pegan’s proposition and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

First, in the absence of statutory authorization or a finding of conduct that amounts to bad faith, a prevailing party may not recover attorney fees. State ex rel. Pennington v. Gundler (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 171, 173, 661 N.E.2d 1049, 1051; Vance v. Roedersheimer (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 552, 556, 597 N.E.2d 153,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Muze v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wilborn v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Becker v. Direct Energy, LPOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Stonehenge Land Co. v. Beazer Homes Investments, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. MRI Software, L.L.C. v. W. Oaks Mall FL, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API