Legal Opinion
Muze v. Mayfield
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1991No. 90-1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The issue presented for our review is whether payment of costs of a previously dismissed action under Civ.R. 41(D) includes attorney fees. For the reasons that follow, we hold that attorney fees are not costs of a previously dismissed action.
Civ. R. 41(D) reads as follows:
“If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Sturm v. SturmOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Howard v. WillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- O'Loughlin v. Ottawa St. Condominium Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.