Legal Opinion

Baker v. Deutschland Gmbh

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 2016No. 1:16-cv-00260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

John E. Jonés III, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Edward Baker and Jack Miller bring the above-captioned putative class action asserting a medical monitoring claim against Defendants Sorin Group Deutschland Gmbh (“Sorin”) and Sorin Group USA, Inc. (“Sorin”). Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on March 21, 2016 (Doc. 8) alleging that the putative class was exposed to nontuberculous mycobac-terium (“MTM”) through a Sorin 3T Heater-Cooler System (“3T System”) used, to regulate their blood temperature during open heart surgeries at WellSpan York Hospital (“WellSpan”)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Altimari v. Bucks County Railroad Preservation and Restoration Corp. d/b/a New Hope & Ivyland RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Clemens v. Execupharm, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. GRIMLEY v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Lalonnnie C. Huratiak v. NewRez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. OPRIS v. SINCERA REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API