Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Beaber

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1999No. 98-0808PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

A court that renders a final order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship generally retains continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the order. Tex. Fam. Code §§ 155.001(a), 155.003(a). This jurisdiction may be exercised to modify visitation, which is defined as “possession of and access to a child,” Tex. Fam.Code § 152.002(11), but not to modify “custody” if the child and the custodial parent have established another home state, as in the present case. Tex. Fam.Code § 152.003(c) & (d). We must decide whether a parent’s motion to modify, which seeks to obtain primary possession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Monsanto Co. v. Cornerstones Municipal Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Curtis v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. In the Interest of T.D.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Utts v. ShortTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ken Petroleum Corp. v. Questor Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re State Bar of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. in the Interest of T.T.F., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API