In Re State Bar of Texas
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schneider
In this mandamus action, we consider whether a district court may vacate a Board of Disciplinary Appeals (BODA) order suspending an attorney from prac ticing law after this Court affirmed the suspension order. Here, Real Party in Interest Alto Watson, the suspended attorney, argues that the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure (TRDP) give district courts enforcement power over BODA judgments; thus the district court has jurisdiction to hear his claim. Conversely, Relators BODA and the State Bar of Texas (collectively BODA) argue that the district court’s action in this case interferes with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Perry v. Del RioTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- The State Bar of Texas v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In Re CaballeroTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- in Re State Bar of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Acevedo v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2004
- Goldberg v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Zuffa, LLC v. Hdnet Mma 2008 LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.