Legal Opinion

Morland Development Co. v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1979No. 49621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.

Morland Development Co., Inc., and New-comb Cleveland (appellants) own a tract of land within the corporate limits of the City of Tulsa (appellee or City). Appellants’ land is situated in the flood plain of Mingo Creek, an area subject to periodic flooding. Prior to February 2, 1973, appellants’ land was zoned CS, light commercial, a zoning which permitted appellants to conduct landfill operations.

In 1970, City enacted comprehensive Floodway Zoning Ordinances. In reality, these comprehensive ordinances zoned no land but established the public purpose and procedure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas W. Carter and Mary M. Carter v. City of Salina and the Salina City CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. First of McAlester Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Robinson v. Sunshine Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Call v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Walkingstick v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API