Legal Opinion
Carey v. Herrick
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1928No. 20751. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
Respondent McCarty is the widow of E. A. McCarty, deceased, who, for some years prior to his death, made advances of large sums of money to respondents Carey and wife, who were engaged in the logging business. In 1923, the Careys were indebted to McCarty, and as a consideration for past indebtedness, present and future advancements, they executed a mortgage on certain real estate in Idaho in his favor. At the time of the execution of the mortgage, the sum of $16,020 was advanced, but the mortgage provided that it should be. “. . . security for the payment by the mortgagors to the said…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Michigan Insurance v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Bross v. McNicholasOregon Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Northern State Construction Co. v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 125Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Clark County Util. v. Broth. of Elec.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Department of Social & Health Services v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- American Surety Co. of New York v. SundbergWashington Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.