Legal Opinion

Miller v. Weiant

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 16, 1942No. 1247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UNDERWOOD, District Judge.

This suit was brought under former Equity Rule 27, 28 U.S.C.A. § 723 Appendix, superseded by Rule 23(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, by a shareholder of the R. B. Buxton Co., a corporation, on behalf of the corporation and shareholders, against the directors of the corporation for an accounting of the corporate assets; the corporation was joined as a necessary party defendant. It is now before the Court on motion „ of the complainant to refer to a Special Master. The defendants have demanded a trial by jury. Both motion and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Wathen v. Jackson Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Goff v. EmdeOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Taylor v. Miami Exporting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1831

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. Community Sch. Bd. of Brooklyn, NY Sch. D. 21District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API