Stone v. Thompson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HEARN :
**292 We granted certiorari to determine whether a family court order finding a common-law marriage was immediately appealable under our general appealability statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330 . The family court bifurcated the proceedings to first determine whether the parties were married, and has yet to try the remaining issues. The court of appeals *869 held the **293 order was interlocutory because it did not end the case, and further, that it was not immediately appealable under the statute. Stone v. Thompson , 418 S.C. 599 , 795 S.E.2d 49 (Ct. App. 2016). Because the order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Mid-State Distributors, Inc. v. Century Importers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Callen v. CallenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stone v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019