Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC v. Taranto (In Re Taranto)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 30, 2007No. 06-8034PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.
DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC (“Appellant”) appeals the bank ruptcy court’s order overruling its objection to confirmation of Mark and Kimberly Taranto’s (“Debtors”) proposed second amended chapter 13 plan. The plan provides for payment of the full principal amount of the Appellant’s secured claim approximately 45 months sooner than provided for in the contract and for payment of interest at the contract rate of zero percent. The Appellant asserts it is entitled to prime-plus interest in accordance with Till v. SCS Credit Corp., infra. The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Trejos v. VW Credit, Inc. (In Re Trejos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re HayesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
- In Re DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- State Bank v. Miller (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Clippard v. Ragle (In Re Ragle)District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.