Trejos v. VW Credit, Inc. (In Re Trejos)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The bankruptcy court ruled that creditor held by assignment a valid purchase-money security interest in debtors’ vehicle purchased within the 910-day period immediately preceding the date debtors filed their voluntary chapter 13 2 petition, making creditor’s claim subject to the anti-cramdown provision in the “Hanging Paragraph” of § 1325(a). As a result, the bankruptcy court held that the debtors were required to pay the full amount of the creditor’s claim over the life of their chapter 13 plan, irrespective of the value of the vehicle. We AFFIRM.
I. FACTS
On July…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re EzellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Ransom v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Ransom)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re GraupnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- In Re ShatUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2010
- Smith v. Rojas (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance v. Rodriguez (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.