Legal Opinion

State v. Bradshaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2003No. ED 81556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

Julius Bradshaw (hereinafter, “Defendant”) was charged with one count of possession of a controlled substance. Defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized during a search of his vehicle. The trial court granted Defendant’s motion, and the State filed an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Section 547.200.1 RSMo (2002)1 from the trial court’s order. We affirm.

The facts are essentially undisputed and are as follows: Detective Raymond M. Floyd (hereinafter, “Det.Floyd”) of the Troy City Police Department observed a vehicle parked on the side of the road in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. MaginnisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. DavalosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. CarolloMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API