Legal Opinion
State v. Maginnis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 2004No. WD 62896PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
Stephen Paul Maginnis appeals his convictions for trafficking in the second degree, § 195.223, RSMo.2000, and possession with intent to distribute, § 195.211, RSMo.2000, for which he received concurrent prison sentences of eighteen years and twelve years, respectively. Maginnis asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress and in admitting the evidence that led to his conviction because it was obtained as the result of an unlawful search and seizure.
Statement of Facts
The evidence is viewed in the fight most favorable to the trial court’s judgment. At 3:30 p.m. on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Jaime Soto, Also Known as Leonel GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. StoverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. BibbinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.