Legal Opinion

Matthiessen v. Duntley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 1922No. Gen. No. 27,037Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Conrad H. Matthiessen brought suit against William 0. Duntley on a promissory note for $25,000 dated December 2, 1914, due 5 years after date, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum, payable annually. The defendant’s affidavit of merits was stricken on account of its insufficiency as a matter of law. He elected to stand by his affidavit of merits and judgment was thereupon entered against him for the amount of plaintiff’s claim, $28,125, to reverse which this writ of error is prosecuted.

Plaintiff in his amended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honeyman v. JarvisIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. American Credit Indemnity Co. of New York v. YamerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Sheldon v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Bond v. Duntley Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Goding v. MacArthur Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API