Honeyman v. Jarvis
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAllister
This was assumpsit, by the original payee of a promissory note, against the makers, one of whom, the appellant, filed three special pleas, to all of which the court below sustained a general demurrer. The 'sufficiency of. these pleas is the only matter for decision. The first plea, after the formal part, is in these words: “And there was no consideration for said note, and that said defendant was not indebted to said plaintiff at the time of giving said note, upon any consideration whatever; and that the said promise of said defendant was a mere naked promise without any consideration…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vanlandingham v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
- Parks v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
- Kirkpatrick v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Jones v. BuffumIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Smith v. DotyIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States National Bank v. ChappellMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- McMillan v. GardnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Miles v. AndrewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Sheldon v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Green v. JenningsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.