Legal Opinion

Drennen v. Banks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 19, 1894PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. As to the issue of the writ of mandamus referred to in the opinion, see the next case of County Commissioners of Cecil County v. Banks.

1Opinion of the Court

McSherry, J.,

delivered the dpinion of the Court.

By sec. 119 of Art. 8 of the Code of Public Local Laws, the County Commissioners of Cecil County were authorized to appoint annually a county treasurer, whose duties were defined by that and the two succeeding sections. His salary and fees were fixed, and he was empowered to appoint one or more deputies, whose compensation was directed to be paid out of his salary. By the Act of 1894, ch. 25, secs. 119, 122 and 123 of Article 8 of the Local Code were repealed and re-enacted with amendments. In the new section 119, it was provided, amongst other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  2. Regents of the University of Maryland v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1838
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. ReitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Stiefel v. Maryland Institution for the Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Painter v. MattfeldtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. Luman v. Hitchens Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. Ruggles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. County Commissioners v. Board of County School CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Worcester Co. v. School Comr's.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API