Legal Opinion

Hester v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 2019No. 17-9082Relating-toCited by 11 opinions

1ConcurrenceJustice Alito

The argument that the Sixth Amendment, as originally understood, requires a jury to find the facts supporting an order of restitution depends upon the proposition that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the facts on which a sentence of imprisonment is based. That latter proposition is supported by decisions of this Court, see United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 230-232, 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) ; Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 478, 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), but it represents a questionable interpretation of the original meaning of the Sixth…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Williams MD v. Homeland InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Malik NasirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Brianna Marie Peterson v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
  4. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. RobisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API