State v. Robison
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,903 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT JAMES ROBISON III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The current Kansas criminal restitution statutes do not trigger Sixth Amendment protections as contemplated by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476, 120 S. Ct. 2348,
147 L. Ed. 2d 435
(2000), and its progeny. 2. At a minimum, section 5 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights protects as inviolate the procedural right to have a jury decide the contested questions juries historically decided when the Kansas Constitution came into existence. 3.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State ex rel. Donaldson v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- State v. YoungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- Zaragoza v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025