(PC)Person v. Peery
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WALTER PERSON, No. 2:20-cv-0622 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SUZANNE PERRY, et al., 15 Defendants.1 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and 18 has requested authority pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915
to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 19 2, 5). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 20
636(b)(1)(B). 21 For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis shall be 22…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.