Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Kimco Realty Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 10, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00073Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PEARL MORGAN, Case No. 3:21-cv-00073-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. KIMCO REALTY CORPORATION, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Pearl Morgan (“Morgan”) filed this action against Kimco Realty Corporation (“Kimco”), alleging claims for negligence and negligence per se. (ECF No. 1-1.) Now before the Court is Kimco’s motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 14.) The Court has jurisdiction over Morgan’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1332, and all parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lawana Porter v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- McAlpine v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.