Legal Opinion

Baker v. Cox

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1985No. 858SC195PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff calls upon us to determine the validity of a tentative or “Totten” trust in North Carolina. In jurisdictions which recognized them, tentative trusts are created when a deposit is made by the depositor in his own name in trust for another. See In re Totten, 179 N.Y. 112, 71 N.E. 748 (1904). The parties to this action cite Wescott v. Bank, 227 N.C. 39, 40 S.E. 2d 461 (1946); Ridge v. Bright, 244 N.C. 345, 93 S.E. 2d 607 (1956); Sinclair v. Travis, 231 N.C. 345, 57 S.E. 2d 394 (1950); Kyle v. Groce, 50 N.C. App. 204, 272 S.E. 2d 609 (1980); Baxter v. Jones, 14 N.C.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Sinclair v. TravisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Ridge v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Wescott v. First & Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bland v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Jimenez v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Underwood v. Bank of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Underwood v. Bank of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API